The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
URBANITY-25 FIRST RELEASE TICKETS ON SALE LIMITED AVAILABILITY
URBANITY-25 FIRST RELEASE TICKETS ON SALE LIMITED AVAILABILITY
SEE DETAILSDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Partner Lab
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
OtherStaff WriterSun 23 Oct 16

The Case For Brownfield Redevelopment

P2271188_620x380

By Craig Faull, WSP I Parsons Brinckerhoff Section Executive, Land Restoration & Ground Engineering

The redevelopment of idle, contaminated commercial and industrial properties or ‘brownfields’ sitting in many of our communities presents a prime opportunity to bolster our economy and our communities while improving environmental health.  The remediation of urban brownfield sites also offers us a highly sustainable way to manage, at least in part, the need for increased space in our cities.

Brownfields are typically located on industrial or commercial property where chemicals have historically been used. The perceived ‘higher cost’ and longer timeline associated with brownfield redevelopment compared to developing clean ‘greenfields’ has often limited this form of  redevelopment with liability concerns also acting as a deterrent.

The benefit of ‘sustainable remediation’ that takes account of end use requirements and looks to deliver outcomes with minimum expenditure, typically will likely far outweigh any perceived or real risks.  If remediation evaluation takes account of end use requirements and analyses the cost benefit ratio, brownfield remediation need not be complex, lengthy or overly expensive.
The cost-benefit ratio
Embarking on site remediation can prove daunting for many developers. With significant upfront costs, developers can often discount any kind of land remediation as an option.

However associated cost and timelines fall within a broad spectrum with the degree of remediation work varying considerably from site to site. For example, future residential sites will usually require a higher standard of remediation than a commercial site, such as an office block or car park, and will typically take longer to treat and prove more costly.

Sustainable remediation offers one practical option as it strikes a balance between the cost and benefit of brownfield development both now and into the future.

The sustainable remediation process has been accurately defined by The UK Sustainable Remediation Forum as being ‘the practice of demonstrating, in terms of environmental, economic and social indicators, that the benefit of undertaking remediation is greater than its impact, and that the optimum remediation solution is selected through the use of a balanced decision-making process.’

When considering remediation as an option, it is important to engage with key stakeholders early. By doing this we can build likely constraints into a concept design. Building in this degree of flexibility goes a long way towards ensuring we achieve a balance between development needs and contamination constraints.

If the concept design is tailored to meet contamination constraints, remediation could be as simplistic as creating a barrier to the contamination for instance; by capping open space areas; or by placing a sub slab vapour extraction system underneath a building.

Developing a targeted site environmental management plan will also assist in mitigating future risk. Whatever the chosen remediation method, it is important that the process and the technology used are tailored to achieve the best result while factoring in cost, time and environmental objectives.
Sustainable remediation in action
Every brownfield site differs depending on previous land use and the nature of the contaminants that have been present. A range of different ‘clean-up’ techniques and degrees of remediation can be applied.

It is only through proper analysis of a brownfield site that sustainable management decisions can be made about the extent of proposed remediation, and repurposing of the land. An example of two such projects, one in Queensland and the other in South Australia, perfectly illustrate this point.

The projects centred on the demolition and remediation of two bulk fuel terminals.  Each site had very specific and different contamination profiles. This required us to undertake detailed soil classification and a subsequent human health risk assessment to define achievable (and minimum) clean up goals which satisfied the regulatory and contractual obligations that were imposed on the site tenants.

Sustainable remediation objectives were met, as soil treatment requirements (and subsequent costs) were considerably reduced as a consequence.

The sustainable remediation objectives for the project also extended to the demolition phase ensuring that demolition waste was recycled, repurposed or reused wherever possible.

In addition to recycling concrete, hardwood timber and scrap steel from the sites, the recovery extended to the onsite treatment of over 1 million litres of contaminated ballast water to a level that rendered it suitable for reuse. The remainder was disposed to sewer under a Trade Waste Approval – saving a substantial amount of cost in liquid waste disposal.

Arguing the case for brownfield
The remediation of brownfield sites offers a highly sustainable solution that can accommodate the growth needs of our cities. In the long run, the benefits of sustainable remediation will likely far outweigh any risks.

If brownfield remediation options are assessed and optioneered carefully, developers have a viable and sustainable urban land re-use option at their disposal that is neither too onerous nor too costly to implement.

Brownfield redevelopment projects can also provide an immediate infusion of investment in areas that previously lay vacant as well as contributing to more vibrant and healthy communities.

Another long-term economic benefit of brownfield redevelopment is its impact on public infrastructure costs as the majority of brownfield sites are located in developed areas with redevelopment maximising the use of existing public infrastructure.

The Urban Developer is proud to partner with WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff to deliver this article to you. In doing so, we can continue to publish our free daily news, information, insights and opinion to you, our valued readers. 

IndustrialAustraliaConstructionConstructionSector
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
"TheUrbanDeveloper.com is committed to delivering the latest news, reviews, opinions and insights into the best of urban development from Australia and around the world. "
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
High-density residential construction in Melbourne
Exclusive

Stabilising Conditions in Melbourne Bring Hopes of Improved Feasibility

Leon Della Bosca
6 Min
QBCC project trust accounts hero
Exclusive

Developers Warned as Commission Cracks Down on Subbie Pay Scheme

Clare Burnett
7 Min
Urban Infill site at Tonsley SA
Exclusive

SA Grapples with ‘Development Killer’ Carparking Law Changes

Leon Della Bosca
7 Min
Exclusive

Brains, Guts and Determination: How Salvo Property Shapes Melbourne’s Skyline

Marisa Wikramanayake
5 Min
Fraser and Partners founder Callum Fraser
Exclusive

Saving Our CBDs: Architect’s Blueprint Paves Way for Office-to-Resi that Works

Leon Della Bosca
8 Min
View All >
It was for a 2809sq m project next to Bunnings Gregory Hills at 38-44 Lasso Road owned by Anric.
Retail

Anric Greenlit for Sydney Suburban Hospitality Hub

Renee McKeown
The North Harbour marina will go ahead following the announcement of the PDA.
Planning

Burpengary East PDA to Unlock Homes, Marina

Taryn Paris
Retail

Conquest Picks Up Castlecrag Baton After $250m Deal

Leon Della Bosca
The private equity firm says it will execute on the previous owner’s plans for the ageing North Shore shopping village…
LATEST
It was for a 2809sq m project next to Bunnings Gregory Hills at 38-44 Lasso Road owned by Anric.
Retail

Anric Greenlit for Sydney Suburban Hospitality Hub

Renee McKeown
2 Min
The North Harbour marina will go ahead following the announcement of the PDA.
Planning

Burpengary East PDA to Unlock Homes, Marina

Taryn Paris
2 Min
Retail

Conquest Picks Up Castlecrag Baton After $250m Deal

Leon Della Bosca
4 Min
TZ Architects' render of the StoreLocal self storage facility at 50 Railway Street, West Perth in Western Australia.
Industrial

StoreLocal Unpacks West Perth Self-Storage Scheme

Marisa Wikramanayake AND Renee McKeown
2 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://theurbandeveloper.com/articles/the-case-for-brownfield-redevelopment