The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinarsUrbanity
Industry Excellence
Urban Leader
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
A one-day deep dive on office, retail, healthcare, childcare and alternative sectors
UPCOMING | COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SUMMIT
LEARN MOREDETAILS
On Demand

Fireside Chat | Inside GemLife With Adrian Puljich

Building Australia's Newest Airport: Multiplex

The Makers Of The Mondrian | Design, Vision And Delivery Behind One Of Australia’s Most Anticipated Luxury Hotels

Next Gen Now | How Emerging Developers Are Redefining The Game

View All >
Latest News
Scape RMIT PBSA
Student Housing

Scape Eyes University Campus Accommodation Takeovers

Leon Della Bosca
5 Min
Plans for 3-7 River Terrace, tweed heads by turner for briscoe hotel group
Placemaking

Briscoe Greenlit for ‘Transformative’ Tweed Project

Renee McKeown
2 Min
Real Estate

How Rising Costs are Rewriting Portfolio Strategies

Partner Content
6 Min
Placemaking

Queensland Seeks Developer for South Brisbane Visy Site

Lindsay Saunders
3 Min
View All >
Events
Lunch

Women’s Leadership Lunch

Summit

Commercial Real Estate Summit

Summit

Urban Leader Awards

One-Day Course

Property Development Masterclass | Melbourne

View All >
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
SHARE
print
Print
OtherStaff WriterThu 23 Jun 16

Construction Sector Needs Tech Innovation Not Regulation

L

By Lincoln Easton

The failed attempt to re-establish the Australian Building and Construction Commission (ABCC) by the Turnbull government has yet again put a spotlight on the productivity and lack of technology innovation in the Australian construction sector.

Turnbull wants an independent body to keep an eye on what he has labelled “dodgy” practices, leading to disputes, lost productivity and many businesses crumbling.

However, with the fate of the watchdog’s return dependent on the July 2 election result, and many in the sector feeling regulation isn’t the answer, it’s now up to the building industry to find its own solution.

The construction sector consistently ranks in the bottom three innovative industries in Australia. Recent ABS data reveals that only a third of construction businesses could be classed as 'innovation-active' compared with more than half of businesses in the warehousing, media and telecommunications and retail sectors.

In an environment of intense competition and shrinking margins, coupled with forecasts that construction is on the decline thanks to the mining downfall, the building sector can no longer fall back into old practices.
The big drain on productivity
The building industry loves to fight – two thirds of all industrial disputes in Australia are in the construction sector. Since 2012 when the ABCC was abolished, industrial disputes have increased by 34 per cent, leading to hold ups on the build. In fact, in 2015 alone, 44 per cent of lost working days were in the construction sector.

According to a December 2015 senate enquiry report into insolvency in the Australian construction industry, the majority of arguments stem from an “unacceptable culture of non-payments of subcontractors for work completed on construction projects”. Essentially, fist-fights over who did or didn’t do what and who did or didn’t get paid. I saw it first hand over nine years as a CFO for a construction company and it’s the main reason I founded Progressclaim.com.

Of course, there’s also a handful of other causes of disputes, such as disagreements over wages and safe working conditions. Regardless of why, the result is poor productivity.

But it’s not just contractors and workers that suffer – the $300 billion a year building industry is one of the largest growth sectors in Australia and is pivotal to a strong and thriving economy. Over the past decade it has accounted for between 8-10 per cent of annual GDP and has employed about the same percentage of Australians. However, a CRCCI study found that payment disputes cost the Australian economy around $7 billion a year. Just imagine how many more jobs could be created, how much quicker projects would be realised and how many more businesses would remain profitable if those disputes were eliminated.
It’s time to innovate
Despite being laggards in the technology world, there’s no lack of innovative options available for the building sector.

For example: Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) is a building material in high demand by Australian builders, thanks to its ability to reduce construction costs, waste and build times.

Drones are being used by engineers to map and survey construction sites, while project managers and developers such as Laing O’Rouke use them to monitor build progress.

For architects, multi-dimensional Building Information Modelling (BIM) has completely revolutionised how infrastructure is planned, designed and built. And as construction design becomes more sophisticated, so has the software needed to coordinate a build, with platforms such as Viewpoint and Newforma making it easier to manage project information and workflow.

Fintech software is also growing in popularity, with Progressclaim.com now used on more than 100 Australian projects by major builders like Grocon, Mirvac and Icon to streamline the payment approval process, enabling all contract parties to administer payment claims in seconds via the cloud, saving time and money while minimising dispute risks.

Wearable technology such as hardhats with 3D visor displays and safety vests that alert roadside workers of oncoming vehicles look to be the next frontier in site safety and could be key to reducing one of the leading causes of disputes.

So while a return of the ABCC remains in limbo, leaders in the building industry shouldn’t waste another second in addressing the outdated practices, manual pen and paper processes and fist-fight culture which is holding the sector back.

Every construction business has a responsibility to do better, not just for the image of the industry, but their own bottom line. Technology is making all aspects of our lives easier and more efficient and it’s the construction companies that are quickest to adopt these innovations that will be prosperous in the long run.

Lincoln Easton is the founder of Progressclaim.com, a cloud-based contract billing and approval software for the Australian construction industry.

OtherRetailInfrastructureIndustrialAustraliaConstructionTechnologyPolicyConstructionPolicy
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
"TheUrbanDeveloper.com is committed to delivering the latest news, reviews, opinions and insights into the best of urban development from Australia and around the world. "
More articles by this author
TOP STORIES
Sud-slingers are back in action in 2025, with the Sydney market recovering after years of disruption.
Exclusive

Sydney Pub Market Rebounds After Post-Covid Lows

Patrick Lau
5 Min
Gelephu Mindfulness City: Bhutan how a city of the future is planned
Exclusive

Bhutan’s Mindfulness Masterplan Resetting How Cities Work

Renee McKeown
8 Min
Long Bay Correctional hero
Exclusive

Time to Rethink: Fresh Bid to Unlock Prison’s Prime Site for Homes

Clare Burnett
7 Min
Inside NSW Housing Divide-Mosman
Exclusive

‘The Machinery Underneath is Broken’: Inside NSW’s Housing Divide

Vanessa Croll
9 Min
Exclusive

Queensland Decade of Gigaprojects a Developer’s Goldmine

Phil Bartsch
5 Min
View All >
Article originally posted at: https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/construction-sector-needs-tech-innovation-not-regulation