The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinarsUrbanity
Industry Excellence
Urban Leader
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
Urban Leader Awards Logos RGB White
NOMINATIONS CLOSE SEPTEMBER 12 RECOGNISING THE INDIVIDUALS BEHIND THE PROJECTS
NOMINATIONS CLOSING SEPTEMBER 12 URBAN LEADER AWARDS
LEARN MOREDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
OtherStaff WriterMon 24 Jun 13

The future of caretaking remuneration

0

Historically there was no real methodology for calculating caretaking remuneration.

Caretaking remuneration is often referenced back to a dollar value per lot per annum for comparison purposes. Those amounts range from $600 through to $2,000 per lot per annum (with some buildings more or less than those figures). There are no hard and fast rules.

If you are a cynic, you could believe that most caretaking salaries were tied to a value to fit what the developer wanted the body corporate levies to be to allow the sale of the lots into the real estate market at the time the building was first marketed. The ‘market’ might have been looking for no more than $60 per week in body corporate levies.

Insurance, body corporate management, sinking fund and some repair and maintenance and the like added up to $40 per week. The nice neat figure of $20 per week is then left over for caretaking, which is $1,040 per lot per annum. Hey presto, you now have that figure locked away for the caretaking remuneration.  Many bodies corporate and resident managers still use that figure as a reference point for discussions around caretaking remuneration reviews.

Calculating caretaking remuneration by referencing only a dollar value per lot per annum is fundamentally flawed.

Each scheme is different. No two are the same.  They all have different physical characteristics.  Different common property facilities, different physical area, different gardens and grounds, lifts, pools, plant, trees and shrubs and so on.

On top of that they have different legal characteristics, not the least of which are different caretaking  agreements.  The actual duties under each agreement can be very different, not the least of which is a personal duty (paid for by the resident manager) as against what may be a supervisory one (paid for by the body corporate).  Finally there are different committee expectations.

Comparing the caretaking remuneration of one scheme to the one beside it purely by a dollar value per lot per annum is nonsensical unless you also compare what is required to be done under the actual caretaking agreement.  Otherwise you are more than likely comparing apples and oranges.

If people are serious about understanding the cost of providing a caretaking service, what needs to be done is a time and motion study.  The duties need to be broken down and given a time to perform them, and then that time referenced to dollar amounts.   Only in that way can you be sure that the remuneration paid under the caretaking agreement is representative of the work required to be performed.

Part of that review will be the creation of a schedule of duties that breaks down what the caretaker is required to do on a daily, weekly, monthly and as required basis.  The easiest way to avoid disputes is certainty.   An obligation to mow the lawns ‘as required’ is open to interpretation.  An obligation to mow them weekly during summer and fortnightly during winter isn’t.   That certainty also allows you to ascribe a dollar value to those services.

Both resident managers and bodies corporate need to consider these things when discussing and negotiating caretaking remuneration.   In our experience it is sometimes better to start with a clean slate than use the current caretaking duties as a base document.  This is because at the time the agreement was put together, it probably did not cater for what both parties now know the needs of the scheme to be.

When the time comes for discussion about caretaking remuneration, a review of the duties (if that has never been done) should be the other side of that same coin.

 

Hynes Legal are a specialist commercial law firm founded by Managing Partner, Robert Hynes in 1997 and provide expertise in a number of areas such as: body corporate law, aged care law, energy and resources law, and intellectual property law. Hynes Legal are also panel lawyers for the peak industry body: Australian Resident Accommodation Managers Association (ARAMA). Click here to subscribe to their newsletter

ResidentialAustraliaLegalSector
AUTHOR
Staff Writer
"TheUrbanDeveloper.com is committed to delivering the latest news, reviews, opinions and insights into the best of urban development from Australia and around the world. "
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Stockland bumps up its apartment pipeline in melbourne and sydney
Exclusive

Stockland Re-Enters Density in $5bn Apartment Play

Renee McKeown
4 Min
Woolloongabba Precinct Vulture St
Exclusive

Brisbane Developer in Cross River Rail Compensation Tussle

Clare Burnett
4 Min
The Mondrian Gold Coast hotel's food and beverage is driving profits
Exclusive

Touch, Taste, Theatre: What’s Driving Mondrian’s Success

Renee McKeown
6 Min
Fortis’ display suites are designed as brand environments first, with tactile details and curated design to build buyer confidence before project specifics.
Exclusive

Relevant or Redundant: Will Tech Kill Display Suites?

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Exclusive

Missing Heart: Why The Gold Coast Needs a CBD

Phil Bartsch
7 Min
View All >
Stockland bumps up its apartment pipeline in melbourne and sydney
Exclusive

Stockland Re-Enters Density in $5bn Apartment Play

Renee McKeown
South Melbourne social housing precinct
Affordable & Social Housing

South Melbourne Housing Precinct Revamp Takes Next Step

Leon Della Bosca
Aerial view of Caboolture and Bruce highway to Brisbane with Bribie Island Road crossing, Queensland, Australia
Policy

Queensland’s $2bn Push Opens New Housing Front

Vanessa Croll
First projects named in a statewide plan to fast-track supply, including thousands of homes in a major growth region…
LATEST
Stockland bumps up its apartment pipeline in melbourne and sydney
Exclusive

Stockland Re-Enters Density in $5bn Apartment Play

Renee McKeown
4 Min
South Melbourne social housing precinct
Affordable & Social Housing

South Melbourne Housing Precinct Revamp Takes Next Step

Leon Della Bosca
2 Min
Aerial view of Caboolture and Bruce highway to Brisbane with Bribie Island Road crossing, Queensland, Australia
Policy

Queensland’s $2bn Push Opens New Housing Front

Vanessa Croll
2 Min
The Adelaide purpose built student accommodation market is about to increase by 1058 beds with the State Commission Assessment Panel supporting two towers in the making.
Student Housing

Highrise Approvals Add 1000-Plus PBSA Beds in Adelaide

Renee McKeown
3 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/the-future-of-caretaking-remuneration