The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
JUST 12 DAYS LEFT UNTIL OUR FLAGSHIP CONFERENCE JOIN MORE THAN 550 ALREADY ATTENDING
JUST 12 DAYS TO GO UNTIL URBANITY-25 550+ ALREADY ATTENDING
REGISTER NOWDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
3
print
Print
OtherClare BurnettThu 15 Dec 22

Byron Council’s Transparency, Reporting Under Fire

Transparency and the management of conflicts of interest were highlighted as concerns in an audit of a trio of NSW councils and their development application and determination processes.

New South Wales Auditor-General Margaret Crawford investigated Byron Shire Council, Northern Beaches Council, and The Hills Shire Council in the report.

The audited councils were selected by number, value, type and timeframe of development applications determined in 2018-2019, as well as appeals against determinations and local demographics. 

The audit avoided councils that had previously been subject to a performance audit.  

It focused on whether the selected councils and their staff assessed and determined DAs effectively, given that in the full year 2019-2020, 48,540 development applications were approved by council staff, 668 by councillors, 951 by a local planning panel, and 277 by a regional planning panel. 

While much of the audit was largely positive, highlighting acceptable levels of compliance by local authorities and some strong processes and procedures, there were issues raised over conflicts of interest and transparency.

Byron Shire, while credited with establishing clear roles, responsibilities and delegations for assessment and determination of applications, was criticised for issues relating to reporting and transparency. 

The audit found that the council did not adequately follow up on outcomes of internal reviews or a process to identify updates to planning legislation and government guidance, and did not have consistent, consolidated procedures for development assessment. 

The council, on the NSW north coast, was faulted for not regularly updating its Codes of Conduct to manage risks of conflicts of interests within development assessments, which means staff could run the risk of following inconsistent or outdated advice.

Councillors were not required to declare conflicts of interest at meetings, which the audit said “limits transparency in the process surrounding important decisions outlining the preferred determination forum”.

Byron Shire was one of three investigated by the Auditor-General.
▲ Byron Shire was one of three investigated by the Auditor-General.

There was one instance where Bryon Shire Council appeared to not respond to alleged Code of Conduct breaches, saying that it did not meet the requirements of a formal Code of Conduct Complaint. 

The audit suggested that Byron Shire did not effectively ensure that delegations for determining DAs were being followed, and that there were some issues with the segregation of duties and gaps in documentation of delegated authority, which is determined based on the estimated cost of works. 

A lack of procedures for development assessments and standardisation of processes was highlighted, but the audit said that despite these issues being “regularly identified as a key risk by the council and internal reviews since 2013”, this had not been rectified.

The audit suggested that without standard operating procedures, staff might not be able to perform duties consistently or understand the council’s preferred approach, and may lead to confusion with instructions spread across multiple process maps. 

Meanwhile, The Hills Shire Council was commended for establishing a comprehensive governance and risk management framework, undertaking regular internal audits of development assessments, including reviewing completed applications to ensure compliance. 

Much like Byron Shire, however, The Hills Shire Council was criticised for some areas where transparency was an issue, mainly managing conflicts of interest. The audit suggested that it could be better at documenting these conflicts within the development application assessment reports to improve transparency. 

Like Byron Shire, it does not require staff to disclose conflicts of interest, which reduces transparency, the audit said.

The Hills Shire Council was criticised for some areas where transparency was an issue.
▲ The Hills Shire Council was criticised for some areas where transparency was an issue.

Northern Beaches Council, however, was given a glowing report, which suggested that its approach to managing conflicts promotes transparency and that it has identified development assessment related risks and has put in place controls to mitigate and manage those risks.

This was a result of having implemented an additional framework for planning staff to respond to conflicts of interest, which requires staff to disclose any conflicts as a formal step in assessing applications. 

Northern Beaches was lauded for its use of a comprehensive electronic development assessment tool that provides guidance and links to legislation and policy instruments.

However, much like Byron Shire, Northern Beaches does not systematically review the outcomes of assessments, the audit found, and highlighted as an area of improvement.

The Department of Planning and Environment also faced some criticism, with auditors suggesting that the department could do more to facilitate information sharing between panels. 

The report also highlighted the changing focuses of the NSW Government as well as the department. A DPE Best Practice Guide from 2019 suggested that councils should be determining 90 per cent of development applications within 40 days. 

Full-year reports for 2020 said that determinations were made between 412 days for regional planning panel development applications, and 83 days for applications determined by council staff. 

Manly, part of the Northern Beaches Council area.
▲ Manly, part of the Northern Beaches Council area.

The department was criticised for not fully implementing internal review recommendations to improve delivery and governance as a result

According to 2019-20 data from the DPE, 50,593 local development applications were approved in NSW with an estimated construction value of nearly $34 billion.

Previous reviews and inquiries had identified several significant risks that are present within the processes involved in the assessment and determination of development applications, the report remarked. 

These included possible non-compliance with complex legal and policy requirements, potential improper influence from developers and other stakeholders, and perceived lack of transparency within the planning system and with outcomes. 

OtherAustraliaPlanningPolicyPlanningPolicy
AUTHOR
Clare Burnett
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
GYG EDM
Exclusive

GYG Reveals Real Estate Tactics Behind 1000-Store Growth Plan

Clare Burnett
7 Min
Kurraba Point 93 Kurraba Road TUD PLUS
Residential

Council Over Court: How HFO Won Rare North Sydney Approval

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Exclusive

Why Sentinel is Betting Big on Olympic City Office Sector

Phil Bartsch
5 Min
The Port of Brisbane has released its Vision 2060 which details the need for inland rail connectivity
Infrastructure

Brisbane Port’s $15bn Future Faces One Big Obstacle

Renee McKeown
5 Min
Freecity Rouse Hill triple towers 2 Tempus Street
Exclusive

Freecity Takes Covers Off $330m Triple Towers in Sydney’s North-West

Leon Della Bosca
5 Min
View All >
Rider Levett Bucknall's latest Construction Market Update for Q2, 2025 shows that overseas conflict is creating supply chain disruption and increased construction costs.
Construction

Supply Chains Battered as Overseas Conflicts Rage On

Marisa Wikramanayake
Sponsored

Covering the Gaps: How iCreate Fixes Common Developer Marketing Traps

Marisa Wikramanayake
Stamford Capital Peter O'Connor presents on the debt market.
Markets

Thin Underwriting, Pushy Practices: Banks’ Gripes on Private Credit

Taryn Paris
The appetite to lend is stronger than ever. Stamford Capital's Peter O'Connor drills into what is underpinning the growt…
LATEST
Rider Levett Bucknall's latest Construction Market Update for Q2, 2025 shows that overseas conflict is creating supply chain disruption and increased construction costs.
Construction

Supply Chains Battered as Overseas Conflicts Rage On

Marisa Wikramanayake
4 Min
Development

Covering the Gaps: How iCreate Fixes Common Developer Marketing Traps

Marisa Wikramanayake
4 Min
Stamford Capital Peter O'Connor presents on the debt market.
Markets

Thin Underwriting, Pushy Practices: Banks’ Gripes on Private Credit

Taryn Paris
1 Min
Psiquantum facility in Brisbane
Technology

Brisbane Quantum Computing Megaproject Moves Forward

Leon Della Bosca
3 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/byron-hills-northern-beaches-council-criticism-development