The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinarsUrbanity
Industry Excellence
Urban Leader
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
Urban Leader Awards Logos RGB White
NOMINATIONS CLOSE SEPTEMBER 12 RECOGNISING THE INDIVIDUALS BEHIND THE PROJECTS
NOMINATIONS CLOSING SEPTEMBER 12 URBAN LEADER AWARDS
LEARN MOREDETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
OfficeMarisa WikramanayakeTue 16 Jan 24

Council Refuses Golden Age’s Brighton Plans

Carr Architects' render of Golden Age Group's project at 47 South Road, Brighton.

Prolific Victorian developer Golden Age Group’s plans for a site in Brighton have hit a hurdle with the council refusing permission for its two applications.

The developer submitted an application for subdivision on a site at 47 South Road and an application for developing a masterplanned community on the site comprising 84 two- and three-bedroom homes with the City of Bayside.

Brighton, long one of the most desirable addresses in Melbourne, is 11km south-east of the CBD.

The council’s Planning and Amenity Delegated Committee refused both applications at its December 11 meeting, despite the City of Bayside council's planning officers recommending that the applications be approved.

There were 105 objections to the development application and 54 to the subdivision application. 

Concerns were raised about noise levels, the impact on existing heritage properties, the issue of inadequate trunk infrastructure to support the project, overdevelopment, overshadowing and overlooking considerations.

The plans by Carr Architects included the 84 homes on 75 per cent of the 32,926sq m site plus 172 car parking spaces and 17 bicycle spaces within 14 buildings.

Council records said that the cost of the project was more than $50 million but as it did not include social housing provisions it was ineligible to be submitted to the fasttrack process with the Victorian Department of Transport and Planning. 

The committee said that the proposal failed to implement the Municipal Planning Strategy and Planning Policy Framework or abide by the Bayside Planning Scheme in terms of roof form, material diversity within the streetscape, respecting the neighbouring building forms and scale and facades.

It also said that the proposal did not comply with regards to public open space, diversity of homes, neighbourhood character, traffic outcomes, urban design outcomes and built form. 

Both an application for development of the site and one for subdivision were rejected by the City of Bayside Council.
▲ A render of part of the project filed by Golden Age Group for a site in Brighton and rejected by the City of Bayside.

Councillor Samuel King proposed a two part motion, seconded by deputy mayor Alex del Porto, to refuse permission and to engage appropriate legal representation and expert evidence should the matter proceed to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

This and a similar one refuse permission for the second application for the subdivision of the site were unanimously carried.

Golden Age Group was contacted by The Urban Developer but declined to comment.

ResidentialMelbourneAustraliaPlanningPlanningSector
AUTHOR
Marisa Wikramanayake
The Urban Developer
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Stockland bumps up its apartment pipeline in melbourne and sydney
Exclusive

Stockland Re-Enters Density in $5bn Apartment Play

Renee McKeown
4 Min
Woolloongabba Precinct Vulture St
Exclusive

Brisbane Developer in Cross River Rail Compensation Tussle

Clare Burnett
4 Min
The Mondrian Gold Coast hotel's food and beverage is driving profits
Exclusive

Touch, Taste, Theatre: What’s Driving Mondrian’s Success

Renee McKeown
6 Min
Fortis’ display suites are designed as brand environments first, with tactile details and curated design to build buyer confidence before project specifics.
Exclusive

Relevant or Redundant: Will Tech Kill Display Suites?

Vanessa Croll
7 Min
Exclusive

Missing Heart: Why The Gold Coast Needs a CBD

Phil Bartsch
7 Min
View All >
The Adelaide purpose built student accommodation market is about to increase by 1058 beds with the State Commission Assessment Panel supporting two towers in the making.
Student Housing

Highrise Approvals Add 1000-Plus PBSA Beds in Adelaide

Renee McKeown
Stockland bumps up its apartment pipeline in melbourne and sydney
Exclusive

Stockland Re-Enters Density in $5bn Apartment Play

Renee McKeown
South Melbourne social housing precinct
Affordable & Social Housing

South Melbourne Housing Precinct Revamp Takes Next Step

Leon Della Bosca
The Dorcas Street project replaces demolished walk-ups with 131 modern apartments, the first step in a multi-stage redev…
LATEST
The Adelaide purpose built student accommodation market is about to increase by 1058 beds with the State Commission Assessment Panel supporting two towers in the making.
Student Housing

Highrise Approvals Add 1000-Plus PBSA Beds in Adelaide

Renee McKeown
3 Min
Stockland bumps up its apartment pipeline in melbourne and sydney
Exclusive

Stockland Re-Enters Density in $5bn Apartment Play

Renee McKeown
4 Min
South Melbourne social housing precinct
Affordable & Social Housing

South Melbourne Housing Precinct Revamp Takes Next Step

Leon Della Bosca
2 Min
JQZ Parramatta EDM
Residential

JQZ Plots 10-Storey Addition to Parramatta ‘Auto Alley’ Plans

Clare Burnett
3 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://www.theurbandeveloper.com/articles/council-refuses-golden-age-s-brighton-plans