The Urban Developer
AdvertiseEventsWebinars
Urbanity
Awards
Sign In
Membership
Latest
Menu
Location
Sector
Category
Content
Type
Newsletters
Untitled design (8)
FULL PROGRAM RELEASED FOR URBANITY-25 CONNECTING PROPERTY LEADERS ACROSS THE ASIA PACIFIC
FULL PROGRAM RELEASED FOR URBANITY-25 WHERE THE PROPERTY INDUSTRY CONNECTS
VIEW FULL AGENDADETAILS
TheUrbanDeveloper
Follow
About
About Us
Membership
Awards
Events
Webinars
Listings
Resources
Terms & Conditions
Commenting Policy
Privacy Policy
Republishing Guidelines
Editorial Charter
Complaints Handling Policy
Contact
General Enquiries
Advertise
Contribution Enquiry
Project Submission
Membership Enquiry
Newsletter
Stay up to date and with the latest news, projects, deals and features.
Subscribe
ADVERTISEMENT
SHARE
print
Print
OfficeMarisa WikramanayakeTue 16 Jan 24

Council Refuses Golden Age’s Brighton Plans

Carr Architects' render of Golden Age Group's project at 47 South Road, Brighton.

Prolific Victorian developer Golden Age Group’s plans for a site in Brighton have hit a hurdle with the council refusing permission for its two applications.

The developer submitted an application for subdivision on a site at 47 South Road and an application for developing a masterplanned community on the site comprising 84 two- and three-bedroom homes with the City of Bayside.

Brighton, long one of the most desirable addresses in Melbourne, is 11km south-east of the CBD.

The council’s Planning and Amenity Delegated Committee refused both applications at its December 11 meeting, despite the City of Bayside council's planning officers recommending that the applications be approved.

There were 105 objections to the development application and 54 to the subdivision application. 

Concerns were raised about noise levels, the impact on existing heritage properties, the issue of inadequate trunk infrastructure to support the project, overdevelopment, overshadowing and overlooking considerations.

The plans by Carr Architects included the 84 homes on 75 per cent of the 32,926sq m site plus 172 car parking spaces and 17 bicycle spaces within 14 buildings.

Council records said that the cost of the project was more than $50 million but as it did not include social housing provisions it was ineligible to be submitted to the fasttrack process with the Victorian Department of Transport and Planning. 

The committee said that the proposal failed to implement the Municipal Planning Strategy and Planning Policy Framework or abide by the Bayside Planning Scheme in terms of roof form, material diversity within the streetscape, respecting the neighbouring building forms and scale and facades.

It also said that the proposal did not comply with regards to public open space, diversity of homes, neighbourhood character, traffic outcomes, urban design outcomes and built form. 

Both an application for development of the site and one for subdivision were rejected by the City of Bayside Council.
▲ A render of part of the project filed by Golden Age Group for a site in Brighton and rejected by the City of Bayside.

Councillor Samuel King proposed a two part motion, seconded by deputy mayor Alex del Porto, to refuse permission and to engage appropriate legal representation and expert evidence should the matter proceed to the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal.

This and a similar one refuse permission for the second application for the subdivision of the site were unanimously carried.

Golden Age Group was contacted by The Urban Developer but declined to comment.

ResidentialMelbourneAustraliaPlanningPlanningSector
AUTHOR
Marisa Wikramanayake
The Urban Developer
More articles by this author
ADVERTISEMENT
TOP STORIES
Exclusive

Accor Deputy Delivers Verdict on Brisbane Games Hotel Shortfall

Phil Bartsch
6 Min
Qld Budget 2025-26 Brisbane City
Exclusive

Billions Promised, Now Deliver: Industry’s Qld Budget Verdict

Vanessa Croll
6 Min
Medium Density housing in NSW
Exclusive

NSW Budget ‘Groundbreaking’ $1bn Guarantee to Unlock Housing

Leon Della Bosca
7 Min
Exclusive

Azure’s Trent Keirnan on Playing the Long Game

Taryn Paris
5 Min
Exclusive

Private Credit Surge, Skittish Buyers Force Banks to Loosen Presale Rules

Taryn Paris
5 Min
View All >
Ledlin Developments Somerville Business Park
Industrial

Ledlin Plots $13m Somerville Premium Business Park

Leon Della Bosca
Not-for-profit BaptistCare is about to embark on one of its biggest projects to date, a 6.4ha development in Sydney’s north west with a capital investment value exceeding $2 billion.
Placemaking

BaptistCare Plans $2bn Precinct at Macquarie Park

Renee McKeown
TimePlace Manly shoptop
Construction

Time & Place Plans Second Manly Project as First Begins

Vanessa Croll
The Melbourne-based developer has advanced its push into Sydney, breaking ground on its high-end coastal shoptop at Manl…
LATEST
Ledlin Developments Somerville Business Park
Industrial

Ledlin Plots $13m Somerville Premium Business Park

Leon Della Bosca
3 Min
Not-for-profit BaptistCare is about to embark on one of its biggest projects to date, a 6.4ha development in Sydney’s north west with a capital investment value exceeding $2 billion.
Placemaking

BaptistCare Plans $2bn Precinct at Macquarie Park

Renee McKeown
2 Min
TimePlace Manly shoptop
Construction

Time & Place Plans Second Manly Project as First Begins

Vanessa Croll
2 Min
Builder Hansen Yuncken has completed construction of ISPT and HESTA's latest addition to the St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne Precinct.
Life Sciences

ISPT, HESTA $140m Fitzroy Life Science Tower Tops Out

Marisa Wikramanayake
2 Min
View All >
ADVERTISEMENT
Article originally posted at: https://theurbandeveloper.com/articles/council-refuses-golden-age-s-brighton-plans